<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ask the Photographer &#187; Camera Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://askthephotographer.com/category/reviews/camera-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://askthephotographer.com</link>
	<description>No question is too big or small</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Pentax K20D full review</title>
		<link>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/27/pentax-k20d-full-review/</link>
		<comments>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/27/pentax-k20d-full-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askthephotographer.com/?p=1042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

You may have thought Pentax had gone the way of the buffalo, but could it be headed toward a comeback with the K20D? Here&#8217;s a link to a full review to help you decide. You can also check out a corporate video about the product here.


The guys at dpreview seemed fairly impressed. Here’s an excerpt:
 
 
The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/27/pentax-k20d-full-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Coolpix S600 Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/10/nikon-coolpix-s600-reviewed-5/</link>
		<comments>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/10/nikon-coolpix-s600-reviewed-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Compact Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Coolpix S600]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Coolpix S600 Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nikon Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nikon Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nikon Coolpix S600]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nikon Coolpix S600 Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/10/nikon-coolpix-s600-reviewed-5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s some shortcomings with this compact camera but does that hold it back?
The Mercury News.com has the look at Nikon&#8217;s ultra-slim compact camera, and the results are mixed. Here&#8217;s what they had to say:
On one hand, the Nikon Coolpix S600 is a very attractive ultracompact capable of producing pretty 10-megapixel photos. On the other hand, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/10/nikon-coolpix-s600-reviewed-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kodak Easyshare V1073 Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/10/kodak-easyshare-v1073-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/10/kodak-easyshare-v1073-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Compact Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Easyshare V1073]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Easyshare V1073 Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kodak Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kodak Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kodak Easyshare V1073]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kodak Easyshare V1073 Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[V1073]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/10/kodak-easyshare-v1073-reviewed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a fairly expensive point-and-shoot with some nice features from Kodak.
PC World says you get what you pay for with the Kodak Easyshare V1073. Here&#8217;s the rundown:
What&#8217;s Hot 
Sharp images, touch-screen interface, good colour balance
What&#8217;s Not 
Blotchy pictures at high ISO, minor interface issues, some processing lag at times
The Final Word 
Kodak&#8217;s Easyshare V1073 is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/10/kodak-easyshare-v1073-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX500 Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/08/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx500/</link>
		<comments>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/08/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx500/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Compact Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DMC-FX500]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DMC-FX500 Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lumix DMC-FX500]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lumix DMC-FX500 Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX500]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX500 Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/08/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx500/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s jam-packed with features but is it worth the price?Digital Camera Reviews has the look at Panasonic&#8217;s Lumix DMC-FX500 and the results are mixed.
I&#8217;ll get this out of the way up front: the combination of manual exposure control, processing fine-tuning options, and a touch screen interface simply don&#8217;t come together in any other camera currently [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/08/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx500/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FujiFilm FinePix S8100fd Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/07/fujifilm-finepix-s8100fd-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/07/fujifilm-finepix-s8100fd-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FinePix S8100fd]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FinePix S8100fd Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FujiFilm Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fujifilm Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FujiFilm FinePix S8100 fd]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FujiFilm FinePix S8100fd Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Prosumer Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[S8100fd]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[S8100fd Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/07/fujifilm-finepix-s8100fd-reviewed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For being a fix-lens prosumer camera, it&#8217;s relatively cheap and packed with features.
Info-Sync has a look at the FujiFilm FinePix S8100fd.
The Fujifilm S8100fd offers great image quality, a comfortably molded body and excellent manual controls. In future revisions, we&#8217;d like to see a dial for controlling shutter and f-stop settings, and it&#8217;d be nice if the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/07/fujifilm-finepix-s8100fd-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus Stylus 1030 SW Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/07/olympus-stylus-1030-sw-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/07/olympus-stylus-1030-sw-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Compact Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Olympus Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Olympus cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Olympus Stylus 1030 SW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Olympus Stylus 1030 SW Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stylus 1030 SW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stylus 1030 SW Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/07/olympus-stylus-1030-sw-reviewed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You  may have to trade image quality for durability, but it&#8217;s definitely worth it.
InfoSync has the video review and text review of the Olympus  Stylus 1030 SW. Here&#8217;s what they had to say:
The Olympus Stylus 1030 SW isn&#8217;t about taking magazine-quality pictures. It&#8217;s about dragging it through 14-degree weather, 30-feet of water and then accidentally [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/07/olympus-stylus-1030-sw-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon Powershot A590IS</title>
		<link>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/07/canon-powershot-a590is/</link>
		<comments>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/07/canon-powershot-a590is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[A590IS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[A590IS Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Canon Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Canon Powershot]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Canon Powershot A590IS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Canon Powershot A590IS Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Canon Powershot Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Compact Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Powershot A590IS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Powershot A590IS Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/07/canon-powershot-a590is/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this camera an upgrade from the A570?
According to The Star.com, this camera has the right mix of price and features. Here&#8217;s what they had to say:
The best news is the uniformly sharp, good-looking shots the A590 turns out. Lowlight shots at ISO 400 are excellent, and even ISO 800 shots are usable. Movies are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/07/canon-powershot-a590is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus MJU 850 SW Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/04/olympus-mju-850-sw-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/04/olympus-mju-850-sw-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MJU 850]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MJU 850 Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Olympus Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Olympus cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Olympus MJU 850]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Olympus MJU 850 Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/04/olympus-mju-850-sw-reviewed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PC Advisor has the run-down on this weatherproof camera.
Not only is it a cheap compact camera, but it can also take quite a beating. PC Advisor seems pretty pleased with what they looked at&#8230;
Judged side by side with the exceptional Nikon Coolpix P5100in terms of shots captured, the Olympus mju 850 SW comes up short, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/04/olympus-mju-850-sw-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentax K100D Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/04/pentax-k100d-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/04/pentax-k100d-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pentax Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pentax Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pentax K100D]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pentax K100D Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SLR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/04/pentax-k100d-reviewed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This prosumer camera has a hefty price, so does it deliver?
According to CNet, the camera&#8217;s 6.1 megapixel resolution is really hard to justify the $570 price tag.
Description: The Pentax K100D is a 6.1-megapixel, prosumer camera.Compared to other prosumer digital cameras on the market, it is expensive at around $570. 
Pros: This model supports RAW picture [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/04/pentax-k100d-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon Coolpix S600 Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/01/nikon-coolpix-s600-reviewed-4/</link>
		<comments>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/01/nikon-coolpix-s600-reviewed-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Compact Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Coolpix S600]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Coolpix S600 Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nikon Camera Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nikon Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nikon Coolpix S600]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nikon Coolpix S600 Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[S600]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[S600 Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/01/nikon-coolpix-s600-reviewed-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo.Blorge has the rundown on this mid-ranged camera.
And they seem on par with what everyone else has been saying about the S600. Good but not fantastic. Here&#8217;s their verdict:
The Coolpix S600 is your usual mid-range digital photo snapper that comes with mid-range features. With a combination of great and not so good features, the best [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://askthephotographer.com/2008/06/01/nikon-coolpix-s600-reviewed-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
